By now, it’s probably safe to assume that most of the world’s population has heard about the fraudulent vaccine research that’s been an apparent ongoing scientific ‘end run play’ in the USA since the clandestine Simpsonwood Meeting in June of 2000 to prove that vaccines do not cause, nor are they to be correlated with causing, autism [1,2,3] despite a CDC whistleblower, epidemiologist William Thompson, PhD,  stating for the record that CDC scientists actually discarded MMR vaccine research and data indicating the negative impact of vaccines on very young black boys, including autism .
If that weren’t enough, there are other vaccines that cause dramatic health adverse reactions all over the world, which U.S. health consumers deliberately are not permitted to know due to Big Pharma’s obvious media control and censorship. However, the vaccine safety advocacy group SaneVax  has been tracking, reporting on vaccines ‘science’, and also telling the tragic personal stories of damaged vaccinees regarding the three HPV (human papilloma virus) vaccines Gardasil®, Cervarix®, and Gardasil 9®.
In response to the growing number of adolescents becoming seriously ill after receiving HPV vaccines worldwide, in late April 2016, SaneVax released an open letter challenging the European Union’s EMA (European Medicines Agency) official statement regarding HPV vaccine safety. One feature of that SaneVax challenge is a set of questions composed with the assistance of various European experts addressing the three HPV vaccines science, safety, efficacy, toxicity, benefit versus risk ratio, foreign DNA in the vaccines, and other issues. Here is the link to those questions.
One clear problem about the Gardasil vaccine, few knew, was the Australian government’s not knowing about the misrepresentation on the “Gardasil Product Information Safety Trail Data” regarding “product information stating erroneously that saline had been used in one controlled safety trial for under 16-year olds.” That ‘misspeak’ rightfully was brought to the Australian Government’s Department of Health attention; subsequently they acknowledged it along with a correction request made to the vaccine maker, Merck, Sharpe and Dohme Australia, according to the Department of Health’s September 3, 2015 letter to Dr Deirdre Little.
Isn’t it interesting how scientific facts either get lost or messy like spaghetti?
One of the SaneVax questions asked, as part of a seven-page query, is most disturbing:
“As far as we know health professionals have not been warned to look for the risk of leukaemia among vaccinated adolescents as suggested in the assessment report referred to below (*). What actions (if any) have been undertaken to determine whether or not HPV vaccines could cause or trigger this condition in certain pre-disposed individuals?”
Nevertheless, a powerful feature of the SaneVax challenge includes 15 pages of co-signers to the open letter (of which I am one) from concerned persons in numerous countries, who back SaneVax in the questions they’ve asked. That strategic action indicates the scope of concern about the damage HPV vaccines do to those who receive them, especially without prior fully informed consent, e.g., the vaccine package insert adverse reactions and contraindications information. How can the EMA disregard what’s going on with HPV vaccines?
In the open letter to the EMA, SaneVax points out a recent study regarding “Adverse events following HPV vaccination, Alberta 2006-2014” that:
“Despite the fact that this study uncovered information indicating 1 in 10 Gardasil users were either admitted to a hospital or an emergency room within 42 days of injection, the conclusion was ‘Rates of AEFI after HPV immunization in Alberta are low and consistent with types of events seen elsewhere.’”
Rather squirrelly scientific interpretations and reporting, I’d say!
The science and medical literature regarding HPV vaccines, as with ALL vaccines, are skewed in favor of vaccines per se, their Big Pharma manufacturers and what’s called “consensus science,” rather than the actual FACTS of “science-based medicine.” This article highlights those ‘scientific liberties’ or ‘editorial privileges’ plus SaneVax’s most impressive and laudable undertaking to prod the EU’s EMA to “come clean” and be transparently accountable to healthcare consumers.
Source: Natural Blaze