Scientific American Issues Severe Warning on 5G

by | Oct 26, 2019 | Health, Technology | 0 comments

In a recently published article entitled, We Have No Reason to Believe 5G is Safe, Scientific American (SciAm) magazine issued a stern warning about the known and potential dangers of 5G technology

Of particular significance is the fact that SciAm is the oldest continuously published monthly magazine in the United States, founded by inventor and publisher Rufus M. Porter in 1845, and running monthly since 1921. It is a highly influential publication, widely reputed for its rigorous scientific standards, and lauded by today’s fact-checkers as highly credible and staunchly pro-science.

In the article, University of California, Berkeley public health researcher Joel M. Moskowitz argues that 5G, along with previous wi-fi and cellular technology, is much more harmful than the government and telecom industry wants the public to believe.

His primary concerns center around a recent FCC announcement, made in a press release, that the FCC is close to reaffirming the radio frequency radiation (RFR) exposure limits that were previously adopted by the commission in the 1990’s… well before the introduction of 5G, 4G, 3G, 2G or even WiFi.

In short, the safety standards that the FCC wishes to maintain are severely outdated and fail to reflect the growing body of scientific evidence demonstrating harm.

Moskowitz notes that the ’90’s exposure limits only address the singular concern over the potential effects of the intensity of exposure to RFR. With the research we now have available the health concerns are much broader, including a sincere risk of cancer, among other things.

“The latest cellular technology, 5G, will employ millimeter waves for the first time in addition to microwaves that have been in use for older cellular technologies, 2G through 4G. Given limited reach, 5G will require cell antennas every 100 to 200 meters, exposing many people to millimeter wave radiation. 5G also employs new technologies (e.g., active antennas capable of beam-forming; phased arrays; massive multiple inputs and outputs, known as massive MIMO) which pose unique challenges for measuring exposures.

Millimeter waves are mostly absorbed within a few millimeters of human skin and in the surface layers of the cornea. Short-term exposure can have adverse physiological effects in the peripheral nervous system, the immune system and the cardiovascular system. The research suggests that long-term exposure may pose health risks to the skin (e.g., melanoma), the eyes (e.g., ocular melanoma) and the testes (e.g., sterility).

The FCC’s RFR exposure limits regulate the intensity of exposure, taking into account the frequency of the carrier waves, but ignore the signaling properties of the RFR. Along with the patterning and duration of exposures, certain characteristics of the signal (e.g., pulsing, polarization) increase the biologic and health impacts of the exposure. New exposure limits are needed which account for these differential effects. Moreover, these limits should be based on a biological effect, not a change in a laboratory rat’s behavior.” ~Joel M. Moskowitz, Scientific American

Moskowitz also cites the the International EMF Scientist Appeal, which elaborates on the now-known dangerous effects of RFR:

“Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life.” [Source]

Moskowitz points out that,”the scientists who signed this appeal arguably constitute the majority of experts on the effects of nonionizing radiation. They have published more than 2,000 papers and letters on EMF in professional journals.” Inviting readers and policy makers to consider the weight of more than 500 peer-reviewed research studies finding, “harmful biologic or health effects from exposure to RFR at intensities too low to cause significant heating,” Moskowitz believes that more rigorous studies are necessary before the rollout goes forward.

In other words, the scientific jury is already out on the harmful effects of RFR, and the FCC is flat-out derelict in its duty to put public safety above telecomm industry interests.

Regarding the propaganda dimension of this debate, Moskowitz addresses the fact that industry spokepersons and related government officials frequently refer to contrarian viewpoints as ‘fear-mongering,’ pointing out that the current scientific research is legitimate, leaving the scientific community with a genuine responsibility to speak out about these concerns.

“The telecommunications industry and their experts have accused many scientists who have researched the effects of cell phone radiation of “fear mongering” over the advent of wireless technology’s 5G. Since much of our research is publicly-funded, we believe it is our ethical responsibility to inform the public about what the peer-reviewed scientific literature tells us about the health risks from wireless radiation.” ~ Joel M. Moskowitz, Scientific American

Article originally appeared at Waking Times

OYE NEWS

OYE NEWS

Truth, peace, open mind, love and harmony!We don't do this for money. Truth should never be about money. It's a conflict of interest.Become a part of the awakening.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Lockdown 2.0 – The UK Slips Further Into the Twilight Zone

Just as I and so many others predicted, restrictions are ramping up in the UK as the year's end draws closer. The fact that deaths and...

Self-Spreading Vaccines Are In The Pipeline – What Could Possibly Go Wrong?!

One major setback for those pushing the vaccine method of immunity is those pesky unvaccinated. Some people just don't seem to want to play...

There Is No Second Wave

Since the beginning of the pandemic a second wave was warned, in fact it was all but promised. So it should come as no surprise that now we are...

Distributing Vaccines for COVID19 & Flu Consultation Ends Today – Respond Now!

The UK Government consultation for 'Distributing Vaccines for Covid19 and Influenza' ends today. The Government has failed to advertise this...

The Truth About Operation Moonshoot

'Operation Moonshoot' is the ridiculous name given to the UK's new Pandemic action plan. The highly ambitious £100 Billion operation intends to...

Vaccination, Your Child and ‘Implied Consent’

This may be common knowledge too many of you out there, but with so many people only just beginning to wake up to how the World works, it...

Oxford Covid-19 Vaccine Trial Resumes

Earlier in the week it was announced that the joint study by Oxford University and AstraZeneca had been paused because of a serious adverse...

The Great Human Experiment

Humans by their very nature love to experiment, it is how we have advanced through the ages. Our natural desire to learn more, know more and do...

Oxford COVID19 Vaccine Trial Halted As Patient Is Hospitalized

Final clinical trials for a coronavirus vaccine, developed by AstraZeneca and Oxford University, have been put on hold after a participant had...

Children’s New Fashion Accessory Reduces Oxygen Intake While Looking Good

Parents across the World are embracing the psychological propaganda they've fallen victim to over the past several months by doing what they do...

Stay Connected and Subscribe

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and research material direct to your email. You can opt out at any time.

Thank you for subscribing!

Pin It on Pinterest