The year 2020 will without doubt make the history books, we have been and still are living through unchartered territory.
Never in known history have we seen such a radical change in our society, so quickly, through the use of psychological warfare imposed by our Governments and their media cohorts.
Let me walk you through the biggest social scam in history, the pandemic that wasn’t
It began in Wuhan
It all began in Wuhan, with the ‘Mystery Virus’. Remember this from January?
This soon escalated to terrifying footage of people collapsing in pools of blood, surely you remember this coming out of China in early February?
The World looked on in horror as China turned into what looked like the Zombie Apocalypse:
No one could deny that what was unfolding in China appeared to look extremely concerning. The cause of this mystery virus was identified as a new novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2.
Trying to establish the exact date this revelation has proven difficult, as much of the online reports from early on have mysteriously disappeared. According to Wikipedia, the first notification of a new Coronavirus was towards the end of December 2019:
Wuhan Central Hospital sent a bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) sample from an unresolved clinical case to sequencing company Vision Medicals. On 27 and 28 December, Vision Medicals informed the Wuhan Central Hospital and the Chinese CDC of the results of the test, showing a new coronavirus. – Wikipedia
However, links to the Chinese record of this which Wikipedia states, are dead, as is the archived page at archive.org.
I traced the date of first mentions of COVID19 to early January, they then renamed the virus to SARS-CoV-2 in Early February. The definition of COVID-19 was then used to identify symptomatic infections, the disease.
Theories on where this novel coronavirus sprang from were flying around all over the place, until finally the agreed narrative was, that it came from bat soup at the Wuhan market.
Footage soon went viral and was shared by mainstream media outlets all over the World of what they alleged to be Bat Soup sold at the Wuhan Market.
The problem was, this footage wasn’t even from Wuhan, in fact, it wasn’t even from China. This didn’t stop much of the World for a time, stating that the virus came from bat soup. Searching back through the archives now though, it seems history has rewritten itself.
What wasn’t so disregarded as quickly as it was conjured up, was the theory that it came out of the Wuhan wet market. In fact, this theory was held on to by most of the World.
Until earlier this year, most people had never heard of the term “wet market,” but the coronavirus pandemic has thrust it into the limelight. A wet market in Wuhan, China, called the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, is believed to be the source of COVID-19. – National Geographic
The novel coronavirus and the SARS outbreak of 2003 have two things in common: Both are from the coronavirus family, and both have been associated with animals commonly sold in “wet markets.” – Business Insider
But in reality there is no evidence to support these claims, just a loose theory based on, well, nothing. While some still hold the ‘wet market’ theory close to their hearts, much of the mainstream media and science shifted away from this idea and changed it too:
The first case of SARS-CoV-2 didn’t emerge from a Wuhan wet market, according to experts at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).
Instead, the live animal market may have been the site of a superspreader event, where one person spread the virus to many other people, one US-based expert told Live Science. – Live Science
But wait, the plot thickens. Just a short walk away from the Wuhan wet market sits the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). In the months leading up to the first known outbreak, low and behold, what were they doing in this laboratory? Performing coronavirus experiments on Bats apparently:
Documents obtained by The Mail on Sunday show the Wuhan Institute of Virology undertook coronavirus experiments on mammals captured more than 1,000 miles away in Yunnan – funded by a $3.7 million grant from the US government. – Daily Mail
Now, how this ties in with everything I am still not certain, was it a decoy?
No Government wants to accept the possibility that the WIV played any part in the Wuhan outbreak, but it’s hard to deny the plausibility of such a theory, it’s certainly more convincing than the ‘wet market’ theory. But there is one problem, what we now know as the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been found in blood samples as far back as September last year(2019) in Italy.
SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific antibodies were detected in 111 of 959 (11.6%) individuals, starting from September 2019 (14%), with a cluster of positive cases (>30%) in the second week of February 2020 and the highest number (53.2%) in Lombardy – NCBI
With this is mind, any theory relating to the outbreak starting in Wuhan, particularly the WIV goes out the window.
But then again, did the symptoms of those shown in the Chinese footage back in January and February look anything like the symptoms we have seen elsewhere in the World?
I’ll leave that thought with you while we carry on with the Pandemic That Wasn’t
(of a disease) prevalent throughout an entire country, continent, or the whole world; epidemic over a large area.
On March 11th 2020, The World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 a pandemic, pointing to the over 118,000 cases of the coronavirus illness in over 110 countries and territories around the world.
Meanwhile, the UK just days after stated:
As of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious disease (HCID) in the UK. – gov.uk
A little odd, don’t you think. Especially when you consider just days after the UK downgraded COVID-19 from an HCID, they placed the Country into Lockdown.
Regardless, Pandemic was declared and the World was flipped on its head. Not because there was, but because the WHO declared it.
But, But Look at Italy!
The next major Country to be affected after China was Italy. As with China, we were watching footage of what looked like utter mayhem. Hospitals overloaded, bodies being stacked up and the beginning of the 24/7 death count being fed into the minds of the World via our beloved media and Government.
But as I reported early on at the time, not everything was quite as it seemed. Prof Walter Ricciardi, scientific advisor to Italy’s minister of health stated
“The way in which we code deaths in our country is very generous in the sense that all the people who die in hospitals with the coronavirus are deemed to be dying of the coronavirus.” – OYE NEWS
The above dramatic footage was recorded at Bergamo hospital, one of the hardest hit by this emergency.
Excess death in Italy was indeed higher in March of 2020 then the 5 year average, but was the virus solely responsible, or were there other factors to consider?
A report back in 2018 showed that air quality levels in Italy were now at red alert. As early back as 2011, officials reported that pollution was reaching crisis levels. It is believed that particle pollution now accounts for 9% of all deaths for Italians over the age of 30.
The worst affected area in the recent coronavirus outbreak was Northern Italy, and it will come as no surprise that it is Northern Italy that has the worst levels of air pollution recorded.
Later it would also come out that over 96% of those who reportedly died from COVID-19 had one or more comorbidities.
Almost 96% of the country’s virus fatalities had previous medical conditions, data from Italy’s ISS health institute show. The ISS, which publishes a range of studies on the outbreak including a detailed weekly report, confirms a trend seen since the beginning of the emergency, with the average age of Italians who’ve died from the virus at around 80. – Bloomberg
Italy has had a hospital capacity problem for years, it was only a few years ago in 2018 when hospitals were also at breaking point as the Countries worst influenza epidemic in 14 years hit.
It took just 48 cases of influenza in one hospital to push it to breaking point:
The complications of the flu, especially pneumonia, put the reanimations in crisis: 48 cases of seriously ill patients hospitalized from Christmas to today in the intensive care of Policlinico, San Raffaele, San Gerardo of Monza and San Matteo of Pavia, the reference hospitals in Lombardy for the use of the Ecmo, the machine that replaces the lungs.
The problems overlap: difficulties in welcoming new patients, postponement of scheduled surgical interventions and suspended reservations for the bedside of the resuscitations destined to welcome the sick after the operations – milano.corriere.it
Just as Italy’s cases seem to reach the tipping point and begin rapidly declining, fear of the virus began to ramp up across the water in the UK & the US.
But before we carry on, let’s just stop to take a look at the virus itself.
To Be, or Not to be, That is the question
The subject of whether SARS-CoV-2 exists has been the centre of many discussions since early on in the pandemic. With many making the claim that the virus has never been isolated.
Fact checkers have refuted these claims as a ridiculous conspiracy theory, but this hasn’t put an end to the claims being made. So what is the truth, have they fully isolated the virus for full genome sequencing?
The following is a statement made by the CDC:
“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen”. – FDA
Fact checkers have of course come to the rescue and given us an explanation for this statement, they state:
According to de Silva, one reason for using transcribed RNA would have been that at the time of set up, not many standardised and quantified viral stocks would have been available to extract viral RNA from.
De Silva maintains that using transcribed RNA rather than RNA extracted from quantified viral stocks is no reason to question the existence of SARS-CoV-2.
“There are now hundreds of stocks of cultured SARS-CoV-2 in laboratories around the world”, he said. – Reuters
But is having hundreds of what they believe to be cultured stock of SARS-CoV-2 the same thing as having an isolated and purified virus?
No, it is not. Jon Rappoport put it best in reference to isolating and purification of a virus:
It’s the difference between saying WE HAVE DIRECT EVIDENCE OF THE VIRUS and WE HAVE SOME STUFF THAT MIGHT CONTAIN A VIRUS IF WE’RE LUCKY.
They have indeed hundreds of cultured stock of the virus, but none of these are purified. So what you have is vials containing genetic material which matches what they believe to be the virus.
What we don’t have and never have had, is a fully isolated and purified SARS-CoV-2 virus that can be seen on its own in all its glory.
All we have is genetic material obtained from multiple victims of what is being called COVID-19 that matches each other. This piece of RNA genetic material has also been cultured in a laboratory. But it’s important to note that the actual virus known as SARS-CoV-2 has never been confirmed as existing.
It is assumed that confirmation is not required because in many of those with the wide-ranging symptoms being attributed to COVID-19, when tested to see if they contain this genetic material, they test positive.
This is a flawed diagnosis on two levels, firstly we are determining a disease by testing to see if patients have the genetic material inside them which has been assumed to be the virus, but not confirmed to be the virus.
Secondly, we are testing to see if this genetic material exists using a method which is highly inaccurate. This test is known as the RT-PCR test.
The Lucky Dip Covid Testing Extravaganza
Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is a laboratory technique combining reverse transcription of RNA into DNA. It is primarily used to measure the amount of a specific RNA.
The technique however was not designed to be used for testing infectious disease, as Kary Mullis, the inventor of the test states quite clearly in the following video:
“With a PCR, if you do it well you can find almost anything in anyone”
This explains why the accuracy of testing for SARS-CoV-2 is appalling. You need a point of reference, a standard, in order to know exactly how to set these PCR tests up.
Because the testing of the genetic material obtained from patients undergoes a variable amplification process, you need to know where to set the amplification at. Without a gold standard, so you can calibrate these tests, they are in effect meaningless. Which is exactly what Australian infectious diseases specialist Sanjaya Senanayake said in a recent interview with ABC TV:
If we had a new test for picking up [the bacterium] golden staph in blood, we’ve already got blood cultures, that’s our gold standard we’ve been using for decades, and we could match this new test against that. But for COVID-19 we don’t have a gold standard test. – Pathology.com
Jessica C. Watson from Bristol University states the same thing in her paper “Interpreting a COVID-19 test result”, which was recently published in The British Medical Journal, she writes that there is a “lack of such a clear-cut ‘gold-standard’ for COVID-19 testing.”
The gold standard we are told in this case is COVID-19 symptoms, but this laughable. With so many symptoms now associated with COVID-19, you wouldn’t know if they were suffering from hay-fever, influenza, or indeed COVID-19. The test was supposed to be the clarification.
The UK Government know there is a problem, hence the following statement out of their document entitled ‘Impact of false-positives and false-negatives in the UK’s COVID-19 RT-PCR testing programme':
When only a small proportion of people being tested have the virus, the operational false positive rate becomes very important. Clearly the false positive rate cannot exceed 1.6% on that day, and is likely to be much lower. If the operational false positive rate was 0.4%, 400 of the 1,570 positive tests would be false positives.
That would represent 400 people being isolated when they are well, and much wasted effort in contact tracing. It is possible that a proportion of infections that we currently view as asymptomatic may in fact be due to these false positives. – Gov.uk
Or to put it another way, here is a small excerpt from RT News:
Let’s look at the latest figures. On Sunday, July 26, for example, 142,954 tests were processed. Of these, 747 were found to be positive. If 0.1 percent of tests are false positives, we would expect 142 of those 747 positives to be false. If the test turns out to be slightly less accurate – perhaps ‘only’ 99.5 percent accurate (which still seems very good), then 710, almost all the reported positives, could be false. – RT News
Do you see the problem?
While a 0.1% false positive rate doesn’t sound much, when you place it into the context of how many tests are being done a day, which is increasing every day at the moment, the rate of possible misdiagnosis is staggering.
The following video is an interview with Lawyer Reiner Füllmich who is currently taking those promoting the Coronavirus pandemic to court. His case is largely built around the inadequate RT-PCR tests:
Let’s get back to the next major event in the Pandemic that wasn’t. Lockdown is a new concept. We saw it happen in communist China and looked on in horror as blocks of flats were boarded up and secured to ensure no one could leave.
But then it came to us, but because in relative terms compared to big bad China’s boarding up of flats and blocking off of roads; our loving and civilized Governments just telling us we had to lockdown, seemed, well, hunky-dory, so we simply said, OK.
We obeyed, because we are civilized folk here in the west.
I’m going to use the UK as the example here, but the same trends occur in the US and most European nations as well.
So, in the UK, a national lockdown was first imposed on March 23rd 2020. On this day 3 COVID-19 related deaths were reported and 665 COVID-19 infections.
The following are a few excerpts from UK Columns excellent article on the Lockdown deaths:
The mortality spike in England and Wales peaked between 9 – 12 April. It was at this time that NHS England withdrew their “do not convey to hospital” guidance.
Prior to this withdrawal, as a result of early lockdown policies put in place in order to “protect the NHS,” NHS England decided not to allow specified groups of vulnerable patients to be admitted to hospital.
This meant not treating those over the age of 70, who displayed normal vital signs, and any who had supposedly elected not to be resuscitated, regardless of their health condition.
At the same time the government and the NHS were pressurising vulnerable older people to sign “do not attempt resuscitation” (DNAR) notices. Amid all the propaganda about how important it was to protect the NHS, vulnerable people were sent DNAR notice agreement forms through the post…
…. Further, the guidance advised that vulnerable people should not be taken to Accident and Emergency departments unless approved by a clinical adviser, thereby increasing the delay in treatment during the vital golden hour. UK Column
The demands of the lockdown regime also saw ambulance response times increase significantly. Most notably in London, where they more than trebled for the most seriously ill “category 2 patients,” including heart attack and stroke victims.
During the peak of the outbreak 9 out of 10 of the local authorities with the highest mortality rates were London boroughs. Presentations to Accident and Emergency departments (ED’s) were down by 50% in London and the average drop in A&E attendance was down by 53% nationally during the lockdown.
Cancer screening and treatment was put on hold. Cancer Research UKestimated that 290,000 people missed cancer follow ups, indicating that around 20,000 current cancer sufferers, who could otherwise have accessed treatment, remain untreated or possibly unaware of their cancer.
At least 2.4 million people missed cancer screening appointment during the lockdown. As the the NHS Confederation warns that the backlog of planned treatments, including for life threatening and life limiting conditions, is likely to hit 10 million, the Lockdown regime has also seen cancer referrals drop by 45%. Some scientists have estimated this could mean an additional 35,000 excess cancer deaths in the UK. – UK Column
So it’s clear without any doubt that Lockdown will have been responsible for many of the excess deaths during the lockdown period, it will also be responsible for many deaths into the future. What we don’t know is just how many.
It is ludicrous to imagine that the cumulative effect of these lockdown policies didn’t lead to early mortality among the most vulnerable. The lockdown regime was detrimental to the health of the very demographic it was supposedly designed to “keep safe.” – UK Column
According to a new study by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine the Lockdown will be responsible for many more deaths over the coming years, personally I think these numbers are a little optimistic, but here is what they concluded:
We collected data for 32 583 patients with breast cancer, 24 975 with colorectal cancer, 6744 with oesophageal cancer, and 29 305 with lung cancer.
Across the three different scenarios, compared with pre-pandemic figures, we estimate a 7·9–9·6% increase in the number of deaths due to breast cancer up to year 5 after diagnosis, corresponding to between 281 (95% CI 266–295) and 344 (329–358) additional deaths.
For colorectal cancer, we estimate 1445 (1392–1591) to 1563 (1534–1592) additional deaths, a 15·3–16·6% increase; for lung cancer, 1235 (1220–1254) to 1372 (1343–1401) additional deaths, a 4·8–5·3% increase; and for oesophageal cancer, 330 (324–335) to 342 (336–348) additional deaths, 5·8–6·0% increase up to 5 years after diagnosis.
For these four tumour types, these data correspond with 3291–3621 additional deaths across the scenarios within 5 years. The total additional YLLs across these cancers is estimated to be 59 204–63 229 years. – The Lancet
According to the ONS, an extra 25,472 people have died at home than would otherwise be expected from the average past five years.
And a new study from Leeds University estimated the lockdown was responsible for thousands of excess deaths from cardiovascular disease:
A new study has identified 2085 excess deaths in England and Wales due to heart disease and stroke during the peak of the Covid-19 pandemic. – British Heart Foundation
The British Medical Journal also published a study back in May, which found that:
Only a third of the excess deaths seen in the community in England and Wales can be explained by covid-19, new data have shown.
Of those 30 000, only 10 000 have had covid-19 specified on the death certificate. While Spiegelhalter acknowledged that some of these “excess deaths” might be the result of underdiagnosis, “the huge number of unexplained extra deaths in homes and care homes is extraordinary.
When we look back . . . this rise in non-covid extra deaths outside the hospital is something I hope will be given really severe attention.” – British Medical Journal
The evidence against Lockdowns is huge, it just keeps piling up.
Nearly 75,000 people could die as a result of lockdown due to causes not related to Covid-19, research suggested.
Figures presented to the Government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) revealed that 16,000 people died as a result of chaos in hospitals and care homes in March and April. – The Mirror
Danny Sriskandarajah, chief executive of Oxfam GB, said:
“The knock-on impacts of COVID-19 are far more widespread than the virus itself, pushing millions of the world’s poorest people deeper into hunger and poverty.”
So there surely has to come a point when we have to ask ourselves, are more people going to die from the reaction to the virus than from the virus itself?
But to find this out, we really need to know how accurate the daily COVID-19 attributed deaths are. After all, we already know the RT-PCR tests are close to useless, we also know that in just about every nation around the World over 95% of COVID-19 related deaths are in people over the age of 65 and with multiple comorbidities.
Every Death is a COVID Death
So in these unprecedented times, a time when entire nations are locked down, a time when facemasks are mandated by law, a time when the only news feed into your mind is a COVID newsfeed, updates on deaths, images of bodies being stacked up, hospitals reported to be at breaking point, a time it would seem (if you listened to the claptrap coming out of the media machines), that it is entirely possible we could all die from the deadly COVID-19 at any point, is it at all possible deaths are being misdiagnosed?
Well, survey says ‘YES’!:
In England, where daily deaths in the 100’s is just part of the ‘new normal’ it turns out there was a major flaw in how data was being analysed:
It seems that PHE regularly looks for people on the NHS database who have ever tested positive for Covid, and simply checks to see if they are still alive or not.
PHE does not appear to consider how long ago the Covid test result was, nor whether the person has been successfully treated in hospital and discharged to the community.
Anyone who has tested Covid-positive but subsequently died at a later date of any cause will be included on the PHE Covid death figures. – The Spectator
They later changed this (after the peak) to include only people who tested positive within the past 28 days, however this will still play havoc with the daily death count.
Then in the US it was brought to the public’s attention by Minnesota lawmaker and longtime family practitioner, Dr. Scott Jensen, that physicians were being incentivized to put COVID-19 as cause of death:
“Hospital administrators might well want to see COVID-19 attached to a discharge summary or a death certificate.
Why? Because if it’s a straightforward, garden-variety pneumonia that a person is admitted to the hospital for—if they’re Medicare—typically, the diagnosis-related group lump sum payment would be $5,000,
But if it’s COVID-19 pneumonia, then it’s $13,000, and if that COVID-19 pneumonia patient ends up on a ventilator, it goes up to $39,000.” – FEE
Scott Jensen explains this himself in the following video, and yes, if you’re wondering ‘has this been fact checked?’ – it has and this is what they concluded:
We rate the claim that hospitals get paid more if patients are listed as COVID-19 and on ventilators as TRUE.
Hospitals and doctors do get paid more for Medicare patients diagnosed with COVID-19 or if it’s considered presumed they have COVID-19 absent a laboratory-confirmed test, and three times more if the patients are placed on a ventilator to cover the cost of care and loss of business resulting from a shift in focus to treat COVID-19 cases. – MSN
Scott Jensen has also spoken out about how he had received an email from the Health & Human Services (HSS) almost encouraging doctors to put COVID-19 as cause of death, regardless of the facts:
Of course, it’s impossible to tell just how much the data has been skewed by these practices, but it’s likely worse than we can imagine.
What About 2018?
In 2018 something happened in many parts of the World, it was terrible. In the UK 22,000 people died in just one month from this terrible event. Don’t you remember the hysteria, the lockdowns, the masks, the panic? No, neither do I.
And yet, 22,000 people died in just a couple months in December 2017 and January 2018:
The killer flu outbreak is to blame for a 42 percent spike in deaths across England and Wales, statisticians claim.
Government figures reveal 64,157 people died in January – significantly higher than the death toll of 45,141 recorded in December. – Daily Mail
A similar spike in deaths was seen across most of Europe and the US, and yet, most didn’t even know about it. Because it happens all the time, it is nature doing it’s thing.
The psychosomatic effect
I’ve talked about this in a previous article and while it was and still is purely theoretical, it is certainly a strong possibility it plays some part in the pandemic, the fear pandemic that is.
The following passages are from the above-mentioned article.
Psychosomatic disorder, also called Psychophysiologic Disorder, is a condition in which psychological stresses adversely affect physiological functioning to the point of distress.
It is a state of dysfunction or auxiliary harm in substantial organs through unseemly actuation of the automatic sensory system and the organs of inner discharge.
Symptoms from the disorder include hypertension, respiratory infirmities, gastrointestinal unsettling influences, headache and strain migraines, pelvic torment, weakness, sub zero condition, dermatitis, and ulcers. In fact, just about any health issue, including death is thought possible from a psychosomatic disorder.
Just to give an understanding of how powerful this phenomenon is, you need to look no further than Voodoo and curses. These commonly known dark practices can induce very real reactions, including death. But it is not achieved through some supernatural dark magic, it is achieved by someone with great social power placing fear into another.
Psychosomatic disorders can be induced on a large scale, this phenomenon has occurred before, often with no determined cause ever discovered – but a psychosomatic group event nevertheless.
One example of this was at a rural elementary school in Alabama in the l970’s, here is the report published in The Lancet:
In May, 1973, 95 students and 3 teachers at an elementary school in Alabama became ill with pruritus or rash and with one or more of the following symptoms: headache, cough, weakness, sore throat, abdominal pain, sore or burning eyes, arthralgia, shortness of breath, numbness, fainting, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhœa.
More than 50 persons received care at a hospital emergency room. Four and seven days later, 18 and 14 individuals, respectively, most of whom had been ill on the first occasion, sought medical attention for the same problems.
An extensive epidemiological investigation was undertaken, but infection, allergy, and other organic causes were incompatible with the epidemic. Hyperventilation, an apparent visual chain of transmission, and recurrences at widely scattered places and times suggest mass hysteria.
So I ask you, could many of those who feel they have suffered from COVID-19, to the point of death, have been suffering from this psychosomatic phenomenon?
No one can say there hasn’t been a coordinated attempt on a mass scale to place the fear of god into every living person on the planet, so it seems entirely plausible that on some level this played a part.
It’s not a Pandemic, it’s genocide
Genocide; Gen-o-cide; n
The systematic killing of substantial numbers of people on the basis of ethnicity, religion, political opinion, social status, or other particularity.
People are dying in excess, this cannot be denied. But it’s not because of damned virus. People are dying because of the policies and being imposed upon populations. People are dying because of the constant fear-porn we are being subjected to thanks to the mainstream media.
The real death toll of this scamdemic will not be televised, it will not be in your news feeds every day, it will not be charted and analysed. The real death will be ignored, disregarded. Yes, there is an excess death count this year in many parts of the World, which I’d argue were largely due to Government policy and the perpetual fear campaigns, but there will be millions of deaths Worldwide for years to come thanks to everyone who participated in this fraudulent event.
There is no pandemic, there is only murder on a scale not seen outside wartime, this is Genocide.
Compliance Equals Complicit
Now this is the bit many people do not like to hear, and I get it – it’s not easy to be the odd one out in society, no matter how bonkers they might all be behaving. But deep down you know, you know by complying to these ridiculous rules and these ridiculous mandates you are in some way complicit.
But you need to, we all need to. There does not need to be violence or disorder, simply peaceful non-compliance. You do not need to wear a mask, it won’t save you or another. You should not reframe from human contact with others, the benefits far outweigh the tiny risk it carries. You should visit your elderly loved ones, you should meet as many people as you want, when you want.
Stop bowing down to these sociopathic criminals who sit in Westminster, or Washington, or Paris or Brussels or wherever city these monsters tend to hang out in your Country, switch them off, don’t even find out what the new set of rules are. Just simply, disconnect and be free, at last.
I would have liked to end this here, however there is one last thing we need to talk about. What is the purpose of this, what’s the endgame? After all, if i’m suggesting there is no pandemic, then what was the purpose of this event? After all, I agree, seems like a lot of hard work just to kill a few people.
Endgame – The New Normal
The obvious question to ask when confronted with the suggestion that maybe there is no pandemic is, What’s the endgame?
Well, this in my opinion is what I believe the purpose of this event is, the endgame.
We’ve heard much about the ‘New Normal’ since very early on in the pandemic. This new normal they speak of though is not the result of a deadly virus, no-sir-ree! The new normal is a redesign of the current social structure, it is the vision of the elites, a new reality that has been in the works for decades.
This so-called pandemic was simply the perfect excuse to implement the desires of these people. So what is this new normal I speak of? What does it entail?
More social control, this is key to everything else. Without this, it is hard to ensure the successful implementation of everything that follows. What we’ve seen from day one with this pandemic is the constant public compliance and conformity testing. If we say “Jump”, will they do it? If we say “Wear a mask while having sex”, will they do it? If we say “You cannot see friends or family?”, will they do it?
It is not by accident that many of the rules contradict others or make no sense at all, this continual confusion and what often appears to be nonsensical rules are psychological tricks to maximise compliance. Confuse people enough and they will latch onto the next order they are given.
Now, social control appears to be in the bag, I’ve been watching and people are getting nice and comfortable with the new strange World that is being built up around us. Traffic Light systems suddenly introduced at the supermarket, no problem, people didn’t seem phased. They simply stood with their masks on, six feet apart and waiting for the green light.
One way pedestrian systems inside and out, because of course we cannot have people passing each other to close, the virus!! Fortunately people are not phased by this either, they have lots of signs to show them what to do and where to go – and so they do as they are told, without question.
Much of these orderly systems we are seeing are part of the ‘new normal’, a World driven by AI using IOT will, at least in its early stages, will require us to do certain tasks in a particular order. For example, when entering a supermarket it will require one person to enter at a time so they can be scanned and then accepted or declined entry.
The Internet of Things(IOT) is the foundation of the new world, the goal is total control. This is being sold to you under the guise of efficiency, innovation, security and environmentally friendly.
In time, with such a technology, you will need no human policing, no law enforcement whatsoever. Crime would be near obsolete, as the technological environment will self-police itself. Crime will be monitored in real-time, then appropriate measures can be automatically delivered to those responsible.
This AI driven World will be able to freeze access to money, disable your car and lock you in your house as and when the algorithm see’s fit.
But first, comes the Great Reset!
The Great Reset
I’m sure by now you have come across this term, it has been fairly well covered by the mainstream media as well as alternative media, if slightly different takes on the event.
The common phrases being touted by the likes of The World Economic Forum and The International Monetary Fund are ‘Fiscal stimulus’ and ‘Greener, Smarter, Fairer’ , as you can clearly see from this open letter by the IMF’s Managing director, Kristalina Georgieva:
From the perspective of the IMF, we have seen a massive injection of fiscal stimulus to help countries deal with this crisis, and to shift gears for growth to return. It is of paramount importance that this growth should lead to a greener, smarter, fairer world in the future.
She goes on to talk about these three things in more detail:
First, let me first talk about green growth.
Governments can put in place public investments—and incentives for private investments—that support low-carbon and climate-resilient growth.
Second, let me talk about smarter growth. We know the digital economy is the big winner of this crisis. But we must not allow the digital divide to widen so that some countries and communities fall further behind. This would bring more pain than gain in the future.
And that takes me to my third point—fairer growth.
We know that—if left to its own devices—this pandemic is going to deepen inequality. That has happened in prior pandemics.
We can avoid this if we concentrate on investing in people—in the social fabric of our societies, in access to opportunities, in education for all, and in the expansion of social programs so we take care of the most vulnerable people. Then we can have a world that is better for everyone.
She finishes off with a final clarification of these three terms:
And I want to say—loud and clear—the best memorial we can build to those who have lost their lives in the pandemic is to build a world that is greener, smarter and fairer.
You can read more about the ‘Great Reset’ HERE
The term ‘The Great Reset’ is nothing new, it’s not something that has just popped out of the blue since the pandemic, it has been discussed and written about for years. The term gives an impression of new hope, a new start. But the truth is far less appealing.
The Great Reset is just part of the transition to the New Normal, the new world.
The following video breaks down exactly what these utopians have planned for us with their great reset:
The end game is to have a fully automated global system that is unaccountable, it will control every aspect of our lives without prejudice. There will be no exceptions, no “oh I’m terribly sorry but I couldn’t afford my council tax this month”, it will be deducted automatically from your balance.
Human life will no longer be at the whim of your choices, it will be directed and guided without option. Jobs will be allocated, transport will be an automated system without exception. No sick days for that sneaky extra day at the beach for you!
Utopia is a myth, it cannot exist – it is the fantasy of elitists who think so highly of themselves that they truly believe they can make the World a better place. But the problem is, these people do not and never have lived in the real world. Their vision of utopia is our vision of dystopia.
The pandemic has given what seems like a reasonable excuse to lay down the foundation of this new World, it has allowed for increased censorship to ensure independent thought is minimised; it has tested the boundaries of society compliance. It has allowed for new policy and law that would have never been accepted in pre-covid era. This pandemic is the ultimate trojan horse.
There are so many aspects to this pandemic which I haven’t covered, from Vaccines to Facemasks, it’s just so much to cover in a single article and this one is already pushing the limits of most people’s attention span!
But before I finish. Let’s just quickly get back to Wuhan again, after all that is where this rollercoaster from hell began. Now ask yourself, did what you saw in Wuhan resemble in any way what we know as COVID-19?
I keep coming back to this question, because the answer is, it doesn’t. The footage we saw coming out of China did not resemble anything that we have seen outside China. So what was it?
Was this all some grand plan from China, work the World up into a fear induced hysteria using shocking fake footage of people dropping dead in the streets? I’m not convinced. This seems like a globally driven agenda, China may have just been the best place to start the pandemic.
I haven’t worked it out yet. What I do know, is that this is not a pandemic, it never was.
Please share this article and if you want to comment please leave them below.