Earlier this week the UK’s scientific watchdog body, the JCVI, recommended that the COVID vaccinations should not be rolled out for 12 – 15-year-olds. The JCVI stated that the risk to benefit ration was not in favour of vaccinating this age group based on what we currently know about the vaccines.
The assessment by the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) is that the health benefits from vaccination are marginally greater than the potential known harms. However, the margin of benefit is considered too small to support universal vaccination of healthy 12 to 15 year olds at this time. – gov.uk[1]
However, the UK Government is expected to make the unprecedented step of ignoring the recommendation and going ahead with jabbing young teens anyway.
The British health secretary Sajid Javid said in a statement that he had joined with the health ministers of the four U.K. nations in writing to their chief medical officers to request assessments of the value of expanding vaccination eligibility to all 12- to 15-year-olds.
Health secretary Jeremy Hunt is also working to defy the scientific watchdog and said ministers should consider rolling out booster injections even without a green light from the watchdog.
Here is short statement from a member of the JCVI explaining their decision:
The JCVI really doesn’t go far enough in their dismissal in my opinion. They ignore the fact that the danger to children from COVID-19 is virtually zero, while the danger to the children from the vaccine is certainly far higher from what we already know, but long-term complications from the vaccine is still unchartered territory.
Areas of Concern
Since none of the corporate media has the professionalism to share with you potential issues that may occur from vaccinating young teens, I will cover some of the concerns being raised by scientists and doctors around the World, as well as some of the early data we already have in regards to this age range.
Ferility
World renowned German epidemiologist, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, was interviewed by Del Bigtree on The Highwire sometime ago, raising concerns about potential fertility issues surrounding the COVID-19 vaccines. Wodarg and Dr. Michael Yeadon sent a petition to the European Medicine Authority at the time regarding their concerns:
He’s talking about Syncytin-1, well he put it into words in a recent petition put forward to the European Medicine Authority by himself and his co-petitioner Dr. Michael Yeadon the former head of Pfizer’s respiratory research:
“Syncytin-1 […] which is derived from human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) and is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy, is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses,” – Petition[2]
He goes on to say:
“There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case, this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile.” – Petition[2]
Of course, at this point, this suggestion of fertility issues is theoretical, but it is a valid one and no fact checker or state backed scientist has given us any reason to not remain concerned about this potential infertility issue.
Myocarditis
Now this is something which has even been accepted by the medical establishment as a ‘known side-effect’ of the COVID-19 Vaccines, however they continue to downplay the severity and frequency of this potentially fatal side-effect.
A recent study published in the AHA Scientific Journal stated:
Despite these rare cases of myocarditis, the benefit-risk assessment for COVID-19 vaccination shows a favorable balance for all age and sex groups. Given the known potential risk of complications with COVID-19 infection, including hospitalizations and death even in younger adults (mortality remains0.1–1 per 100 000 for persons 12–29 years of age), the risk-benefit decision remains overwhelmingly favorable for vaccination. Therefore, COVID-19 vaccination is currently recommended for everyone ≥12 years of age. – AHA Journals[3]
The following is a table taken from the study which shows the number of cases of myocarditis following vaccination, divided into age categories:
We can see from this chart that in children aged 12 – 17 there is a significant increase in cases of Myocarditis following vaccination compared to the natural occurring expected rate, in fact, according to this data, the risk is increased by as much as 10000%, that is quite a significant increase.
They found a similar increase in the 18-24 year olds as well. As the age groups rise though the risk seems to drop down to around zero.
It is also worth noting though that this data is highly inaccurate due to under-reporting. A Study into the VAERS reporting system showed that the system may be capturing as little as 1% of all vaccine side-effects[4].
The study concluded that:
Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. – digital.ahrq.gov[4]
If we take this under reporting into account the number of myocarditis cases could be even higher than we are to believe, as much as 100 times higher in fact.
There is of course, a counter-argument to the myocarditis concerns surrounding the vaccine which is beginning to gain traction and that is the claim that COVID-19 itself has a higher risk of causing myocarditis in individuals than the vaccine itself.
The New Science website reports:
…a study in the US has analysed how often myocarditis occurs following infection with the coronavirus. Researchers analysed the records of healthcare organisations that cover a fifth of the US population. They found that, during the first 12 months of the pandemic, males aged 12 to 17 were most likely to develop myocarditis within three months of catching covid-19, at a rate of about 450 cases per million infections.
This compares with 67 cases of myocarditis per million males of the same age following their second dose of a Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna vaccine – New Scientist[5]
As is per typical in these mainstream publications, no direct link to the study has been given. I however, am a little too skeptical and stubborn to just accept their word for it and dug around for the study they are likely referring too.
The study is published over at medrxiv.org which publishes pre-prints of studies prior to peer-review.
While I cannot fault the control measures, the study results are misleading and i’ll explain why after this little excerpt from the study:
For the 12-17-year-old male cohort, 6,846 patients met the study criteria. There were 6 (0.09%) cases of myocarditis overall, corresponding to a rate of 1 case of myocarditis per 1,141 COVID-19 patients, or 876 cases per million patients (Wilson Score interval: 402 – 1,911). After adjusting for missed cases of COVID-19 and myocarditis, the adjusted cases per million was 450 (206 – 982). – medrivx.org[6]
But here lies the problem, 12 – 17 year olds are at virtually no risk from getting COVID-19 in the first place, the vast majority are asymptomatic, over 99.9% in fact – whereas vaccinations are being suggested for every single child, without exception.
So this 450 in a million value to be accurately compared to the vaccine frequency of myocarditis would need to be reduced by 99.99% (the actual risk to this age range is about 2.1 in 100,000 according to the CDC data HERE[7]), giving us a frequency of around 0.045 per million – which is significantly less than the naturally occurring expected rate of myocarditis in that age range.
So, clearly the risk of myocarditis from the vaccine is much higher than the risk from COVID-19. I rest my case.
The Unknowns
The two potential implications I mentioned above should be enough for any parent to think twice before considering agreeing to have their children vaccinated, but I should also mention the infinite amount of other uncertainties surrounding these vaccines.
The biggest issue really, and the one that should have made everyone step back and bow away from getting vaccinated is the fact that these vaccines are using a brand new technology. In fact, they are not vaccines at all.
These so-call vaccines have never been thoroughly tested on animals, let alone humans. The long-term consequences are entirely unknown and anyone that claims they are safe is lying to you, unless time travel was involved..
As a parent, you are responsible for making the best decisions possible in regards to your children. I like to think we all want the best for our children, so please, if you were thinking about getting your children vaccinated and knew nothing about the risks, then dig deeper, please.
Do not take my word for it, research yourself and draw your own conclusions – this is your responsibility and in my opinion it may be the most important decision you ever make for your children.
