Are elections, just a show to lead you to believe you have a choice in a free and fair democracy. Do you actually live in a secret dictatorship run by powerful communist banking families? It certainly looks that way; with America heading towards all and out fascism, where freedoms seem like a mere illusion and corruption is rife.
So who is the best person to get the US back on track? Well, it seems the stage was set many years ago. With the run up to the US elections, the propaganda and spin agents, are in full swing; but one candidate stands out more than any other… Hillary Clinton.
With the emergence of a show named “Madam Secretary“, the rise of Hillary feminism for the woman’s vote and the total white-wash of all her illegal and immoral activities by the mainstream media, it couldn’t be clearer, who the chosen one is.
Culture and Media Institute’s Katie Yoder says the Tea Leoni-starring series, centered on a female United States Secretary of State, appears to be nothing short of “pro-Hillary propaganda.”
So lets have a look at the Clinton’s.
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign was bombarded by report after report revealing new details about the finances of her family foundation.
Notably, The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal both published in-depth stories linking undisclosed donations to the Clinton foundation to the sale of US uranium production to a Russian government agency. Additionally, The Washington Post connected Clinton’s personal fortune to the foundation’s donor network and Reuters revealed the foundation misreported tens of millions of dollars from foreign governments.
Uranium One investors reportedly gave millions of undisclosed dollars to the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation. According to The Times, this broke an ethics agreement Clinton’s foundation had struck with President Barack Obama’s administration to avoid potential conflicts of interest between her foundation and government work.
Goldman Sachs, Barclays Capital, Deutsche Bank, and Citi Group gave between $2.75 million and $11.5 million to the foundation and paid more than $3 million to Bill Clinton for speeches.
The foundation’s tax returns
Reuters’ Jonathan Allen also reported Thursday that the foundation’s tax returns were riddled with errors and misreported income surrounding donations from foreign governments.
“For three years in a row beginning in 2010, the Clinton Foundation reported to the IRS that it received zero in funds from foreign and U.S. governments, a dramatic fall-off from the tens of millions of dollars in foreign government contributions reported in preceding years. Those entries were errors, according to the foundation: several foreign governments continued to give tens of millions of dollars. Some experts in charity law and taxes said it was not remarkable for a charity to refile an erroneous return once in a while; but for a large, global charity to refile three or four years in a row was highly unusual.”
Wall Street expert: Clinton Foundation a ‘vast criminal conspiracy’
Adding to Hillary Clinton’s concern that the FBI may open a criminal investigation into her use of a private email server is evidence among the emails recently released by the State Department that she maintained deep ties to the Clinton Foundation while serving as U.S. secretary of state.
In a new report, Wall Street analyst and investor Charles Ortel charges the Clintons and their associates have been engaged in a “vast criminal conspiracy to defraud the general public, enrich themselves and entrench their political influence.” Read more…
Emails expose close ties between Hillary Clinton and accused war criminal Henry Kissinger
Kissinger met regularly with Secretary Clinton, and applauded her hawkish foreign policy in a handwritten message
“I greatly admire the skill and aplomb with which you conduct our foreign policy,” wrote Henry Kissinger in a 2012 letter to “the Honorable Hillary Rodham Clinton.” The compliment was included as a handwritten postscript added to the printed letter.
The late journalist Christopher Hitchens devoted an entire book to detailing the war crimes overseen by Kissinger, who infamously declared “The illegal we do immediately; the unconstitutional takes a little longer.”
In “The Trial of Henry Kissinger,” Hitchens argues the former secretary of state should be tried “for war crimes, for crimes against humanity, and for offenses against common or customary or international law, including conspiracy to commit murder, kidnap and torture.”
Hitchens described Kissinger as a master of “depraved realpolitik” with “a callous indifference to human life and human rights,” who was behind U.S.-backed atrocities in Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, East Timor, Chile, Bangladesh, Cyprus, Kurdish Iraq, Iran, South Africa, Angola and more.
Despite the alleged crimes he oversaw, Kissinger was awarded a Nobel Peace Prize, leading critics like dissident scholar Michael Parenti to condemn what he said should be more accurately referred to as the “Nobel Peace Prize for War.”
“Political satire became obsolete when Henry Kissinger was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize,” quipped musician, satirist and mathematician Tom Lehrer.
Yet Kissinger’s intimate handwritten note is just one sign of the close ties between the accused war criminal and Clinton, who is herself notorious for advocating a similarly aggressive, hawkish foreign policy.
The Feb. 7 letter, which was released in a batch of emails from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, is a request that she help declassify documents from Kissinger’s time as secretary of state, which he says constitute “a unique record of a critical period in American foreign policy.”
Critics say Kissinger helped carry out egregious war crimes in this critical period, during which he served as secretary of state under presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford.
In her glowing review of Kissinger’s new book “World Order” in The Washington Post in September 2014, Clinton returned the favor, expressing admiration for Kissinger. She proclaimed that Kissinger’s foreign policy analysis and approach “largely fits with the broad strategy behind the Obama administration’s effort.” Adopting Kissingerian language, the bellicose secretary of state said she yearns for “sustaining America’s leadership in the world.”
“Kissinger is a friend, and I relied on his counsel when I served as secretary of state,” Clinton revealed in the review. “He checked in with me regularly, sharing astute observations about foreign leaders and sending me written reports on his travels.”
Hillary for President?
Does this sound like a reasonable person to run the United States of America? No, we don’t think so either. However, it would appear that you don’t have a choice (see documentary below).
*Looks like almost every version of the “Hacking Democracy” documentary (above) have been removed from the internet. We found the below version. It’s not as good as the original (shortened / cut) but still gives a good idea of what’s going on.
*If anyone finds the full doc that’s not banned, please post in the comments area below 🙂
The documentary, first broadcast on HBO throughout November & December 2006, exposes the dangers of voting machines used during America’s mid term and presidential elections. Electronic voting machines count approximately 90% of America’s votes in county, state and federal elections. The technology is also increasingly being used across the world, including in Canada, the United Kingdom, Europe and Latin America. Filmed over three years this expos’ follows the investigations of a team of citizen activists and hackers as they take on the electronic voting industry, targeting the Diebold corporation.
“Hacking Democracy” uncovers incendiary evidence from the trash cans of Texas to the ballot boxes of Ohio, exposing secrecy, votes in the trash, hackable software and election officials rigging the presidential recount.
Ultimately proving our votes can be stolen without a trace “Hacking Democracy” culminates in the famous ‘Hursti Hack’; a duel between the Diebold voting machines and a computer hacker from Finland – with America’s democracy at stake.