How Government, Media, Judges, Courts and Prosecution work together to jail activists all staged for State propaganda – UK
SECRET documents reveal a State conspiracy to jail innocent men. The documents sensationally revealed in Parliament yesterday implicate ex Tory prime minister and suspected serial paedophile Sir Edward Heath. In a conspiracy with spooks and senior cops who all colluded to secure convictions against the ‘Shrewsbury Pickets’.
The government has cited national security concerns as the reason it cannot release classified documents that could help overturn convictions against 24 builders, including jailed pair Ricky Tomlinson and Des Warren. National Security is a common excuse used by the failed UK State to hide its criminal activities against the people of the United Kingdom.
But as the world thinks about ‘Human Rights Day’ we consider those activists in the UK who have recently been set-up by the State . These modern activists should have their cases reviewed immediately. It is utterly wrong for justice to be delayed by 40 years as with the Shewsbury Pickets.
To allow Miscarriages of justice against activists to stand and not be investigated, allows corrupt governments to set-up more and more activists and cover-up these heinous Human Rights abuses.
Shadow home secretary Andy Burnham blew the ‘Shewsbury Pickets’ case wide open by exposing previously unseen documents in a parliamentary debate on the historic injustice.
The explosive contents could help clear the names of the 24, nine of whom have since died, over four decades after the 1972 strike over pay and safety.
Mr Burnham said: “The documents I have revealed can only lead us to one conclusion — the Shrewsbury 24 were the convenient scapegoats of a government campaign to undermine the trade unions and the victims of a politically orchestrated show trial.”
They include a memo, marked “secret,” which proves the security services helped make the infamous Reds Under the Bed TV documentary.
The programme, which linked the workers to supposed communist infiltration of the Labour Party, was shown on the very night that the prosecution concluded their case against the pickets.
The memo was sent to a senior Foreign and Commonwealth (FCO) official by the head of the Information Research Department, which Mr Burnham described as a “covert propaganda unit” operating within the department.
It said: “We had a discreet but considerable hand in this programme. Mr Wyatt was given a large dossier of our own background material. It is clear from internal evidence in the programme that he drew extensively on this.”
Another memo reveals that knowledge of this smear campaign went all the way to the top.
After the programme was shown, then PM Edward Heath was sent a transcript of Reds Under the Bed.
Mr Heath replied: “We want as much of this as possible.”
A further note from the PM’s parliamentary private secretary alludes to a “new unit” which Mr Heath hoped was “in being and actively producing.”
“There we have it,” Mr Burnham told stunned MPs.
This is the same Prime Minister Edward Heath being posthumously investigated by Police for the rape and murder of children from care homes.
“The security services were helping to make a TV programme that was not just nakedly political in its aims of damaging the Labour Party. But in the case of the Shrewsbury 24, a programme that was prejudicial to their trial.
“The government were complicit in making that happen.”
Other documents unearthed by the Shrewsbury 24 Campaign reveal how then Tory home secretary Robert Carr directed police evidence-gathering.
A note from a meeting between chief constables and the prosecutors shows some inconvenient witness statements were destroyed.
It said some were “destroyed after a fresh statement had been obtained” because the first statement was taken “before officers taking the statements knew what we were trying to prove.”
That could be connected to a letter from the attorney general to Carr in January 1973 advising him that there was “no evidence of violence of damage to property” at the pickets.
Labour MP Ian Lavery, chair of the party’s trade union group, said it proved the case was a “miscarriage of justice organised deliberately by the state.”
Even Policing Minister Mike Penning, who refused to reopen the case in October, was stunned by the evidence. He congratulated the campaign for unearthing the documents, but bought time by saying:” I don’t make instant judgments.”
And who presided over the Shewsbury trial none other than Government Stooge, notorious Freemason, and corrupt judge Sir Maurice Drake
. Drake also presided over the libel trial of North Wales Chief Superintendent Gorden Anglesea.
The top Police office who raped children from Children’s homes and and then sued the newspapers and magazines who revealed the truth. Drake helped Anglesea illegally collect £375, 000 in damages and helped the State cover-up the truth about VIP child abuse for decades. Angelsea was protected by another senior Judge, friend of serial Pedophile Sir Greville Janner, Sir Ronald Waterhouse. Drake also jailed three innocent men for the murder of Carl Bridgewater. And to top of his career he jailed for life an innocent Jeremy Bamber
for the murder of his family. Of Course Drake is dead and lived well all his life from his criminal fraud on the tax payer. His family happily inherited the blood money and live in St Albans
Ludovic Kennedy said ‘most of the spate of miscarriages of criminal justice that have occurred during my lifetime have been the consequence of police corruption and judicial naivety; the police in giving false evidence to secure convictions against those they have deluded themselves into thinking are guilty and the judiciary in invariably accepting their word in preference to those of innocent defendants.’
But Actually it is worse. If Queens Counsel’s and senior Judges are really stupid t and unable to see truth from fiction hen they should not be allowed to sit in judgment over anyone. If they are not stupid how can they fail to see the elephants in the living rooms. How can they fail to see innocence which countless untrained people find no problem in seeing. They spend their whole working life in the Courts and I can confirm they know how corrupt the system is. They could not fail to know. There is only one reason they go along with such evil and that is because they are morally bankrupt and utterly corrupt.
Corrupt Judges lead to kangaroo Courts where defendants have no chance against the well funded State trio of Judge, Prosecution and Police all working together to deny them even a vestige of justice
How do Corrupt judges ‘get away with their crimes’ ? They are intelligent, plausible, educated, move in the right circles. Their psychopathic tenancies mean they are incapable of empathy or compassion and being elitists they dismiss the plebeian notion that that suffering of the common man is of any importance.
Builders’ union Ucatt acting general secretary Brian Rye said about the Shewbury Pickets “In the 21st century — if this is truly a democratic country — its citizens are entitled to know why innocent men were sent to prison more than 40 years ago, under a trumped up, 19th-century law.”
Edward Heath Raped child:
Jermany Bamber whom Drake sentenced to full life term knowing he was innocent:
Corrupt Judge Sir Maurice Drake: