We just had what the media are reporting as the ‘Damning report’ from Sir John Chilcot known to most as the Chilcot Report, but was it enough, or has it provided just the right amount of dirt on Tony Blair to keep the public satisfied but without condemning Blair to face prosecution?
So in order to understand why Tony Blair lied about Weapons of Mass Destruction being at Saddam’s fingertips you need to go back as early as the year 2000 – One year prior to the events that unfolded on September 11th, 2001, marking the beginning of the Wests ‘War on Terror‘
Global Research reports:
In September 2000, the PNAC group released a document titled: ‘Rebuilding America’s Defences – Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century’, in which the group discusses the need for the U.S. to assert its military authority around the globe to secure its strategic objectives:
“Preserving the desirable strategic situation in which the United States now finds itself requires a globally preeminent military capability both today and in the future (p.8).”
The report then continues to advocate an increase in military spending to enable this “military capability” as well as asserting one year before 9/11 that all this would be unlikely to manifest unless there was a “new Pearl Harbour” event (p.63). In addition, the document lists a number of regimes that the group viewed as “deeply hostile to America”. “North Korea, Iraq, Iran, Libya and Syria” (p.63 & p.64) are all pinpointed as enemies of the U.S. well before the illegal war in Iraq in 2003, as well as the illegal 2011 war in Libya and the ongoing proxy war in Syria.
So who are PNAC, well they are basically a Think Tank to promote American Dominance across the World, setting up a military presence in all four corners of the earth.
Project for the New American Century (PNAC) – The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) was a neoconservative think tank based in Washington, D.C. that focused on United States foreign policy. It was established as a non-profit educational organization in 1997 and founded by William Kristol and Robert Kagan.The PNAC’s stated goal was “to promote American global leadership.”The organization stated that “American leadership is good both for America and for the world,” and sought to build support for “a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity.” – Wikipedia
Their report from 2000 titled ‘Rebuilding America’s Defenses’ can be found here.
Is it coincidence that the report published one year before September 11th, 2001 states that without a ‘New Pearl Harbour’ event on American soil increased military spending is unlikely ? George Bush even refers to the attacks on 9/11 as the ‘Pearl Harbour of the 21st Century”
Taken from the White House Daily Log:
“The Pearl Harbor of the 21st century took place today. We think it’s Osama bin Laden.”
Retired four-star general and former NATO commander, Wesley Clark, disclosed a plan circulating around the Pentagon in 2001 to attack 7 countries in 5 years. The countries named included Iraq, Syria, Iran and Libya were all listed in addition to Lebanon, Somalia and Sudan.
General Wesely Clark in an interview with Amy Goodwin of ‘Democracy Now’ said the following:
About ten days after 9/11, I went through the Pentagon and I saw Secretary Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz. I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the Joint Staff who used to work for me, and one of the generals called me in. He said, “Sir, you’ve got to come in and talk to me a second.” I said, “Well, you’re too busy.” He said, “No, no.” He says, “We’ve made the decision we’re going to war with Iraq.” This was on or about the 20th of September. I said, “We’re going to war with Iraq? Why?” He said, “I don’t know.” He said, “I guess they don’t know what else to do.” So I said, “Well, did they find some information connecting Saddam to al-Qaeda?” He said, “No, no.” He says, “There’s nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war with Iraq.” He said, “I guess it’s like we don’t know what to do about terrorists, but we’ve got a good military and we can take down governments.” And he said, “I guess if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail.”
So I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, “Are we still going to war with Iraq?” And he said, “Oh, it’s worse than that.” He reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. And he said, “I just got this down from upstairs” — meaning the Secretary of Defense’s office — “today.” And he said, “This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.” I said, “Is it classified?” He said, “Yes, sir.” I said, “Well, don’t show it to me.” And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, “You remember that?” He said, “Sir, I didn’t show you that memo! I didn’t show it to you!”
Here is the full interview recorded back in 2007:
So it seems the ongoing efforts to destabilize the Middle East was a plan designed long before any forms of terrorism against the West took place, long before suicide bombers was a known ‘alleged’ threat.
Global Research report:
The reality is that all the wars of the past and the future are planned well in advance of the public ever hearing our morally repugnant politicians demanding action. Countries that resist being absorbed into the Anglo-American-European international order and allow multinational corporations to exploit their resources, are targeting for regime change well in advance of the pretext they give to intervene.
Israel is also set to benefit if the government of al-Assad is replaced with a client state of the West. A study group led by neocon Richard Perle prepared a policy document in 1996 for Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, titled: ‘A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm’, in which it outlines the strategic importance of removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq as well as the desire to weaken the regime in Syria:
“Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq — an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right — as a means of foiling Syria’s regional ambitions.”
War is profitable but aside from that it places the people in the Western World in a permanent state of fear ; Fear generated from manufactured threats of terrorists from Countries ‘we’ are invading. The fear keeps the people of the West in line and more compliant to the ever increasing restrictions of freedom being imposed, while the rest of the World is in a perpetual state of War allowing theft of their land by Western Government Corporate interests, their people displaced across the World looking for a safe place to live while allowing the easy flow of Western State funded terrorists across Europe to continue the terror attacks we have been seeing over the last decade.
All of this is by design and Blair being the obedient puppet that he is did what ever was needed to ensure War was brought to Iraq.
Iraq Intelligence Dossier plagiarised from multiple sources
It was quite literally copied and pasted from the internet by members of Tony Blair’s office:
The Downing Street authors state they drew “upon a number of sources, including intelligence material” (p.1, first sentence). In fact, they copied material from at least three different authors and gave no credit to them. Indeed, they plagiarized, directly cutting and pasting or near quoting.
A close textual analysis suggests that the UK authors had little access to first-hand intelligence sources and instead based their work on academic papers, which they selectively distorted. Some of the papers used were considerably out of date. This leads the reader to wonder about the reliability and veracity of the Downing Street document.
So Tony Blair based his entire prescript for War based on a Dossier which was fake with no ‘real’ intelligence at all. Of course, the UK’s counterpart in these crimes thought the dossier was a masterpiece and praised the Work:
Secretary of State Colin Powell’s historic Iraq WMD presentation to the UN Security Council:
“I would call my colleagues’ attention to the fine paper that the United Kingdom distributed . . . which describes in exquisite detail Iraqi deception activities.”
History is decided by Liars and accepted by the masses
So the conclusion from Chilcot’s report was that we did indeed go to War in Iraq based on blatant lies and information which was plagiarized from academic papers.
Yet we continue to accept information given to the public about other events as Truth, information collected, collated, and presented by the VERY SAME PEOPLE who supplied us with this fake Dossier.
Our entire history is filled with narratives produced for us by the hidden hands of our society, many question these narratives at the time as we do now, but once they make it to academia’s history books and the state funded school curriculum, the lie becomes accepted as truth by the majority.
This is happening now with 9/11 – A narrative with no evidence, created by people who have been caught lying in the past, is now being introduced into the Classroom and textbooks around the World.
We must continue to stick holes in historical events as well as current and future events, if we do not we will be as responsible for the downfall of mankind as those pulling the strings.
As for Tony Blair, he is just another power-driven puppet who did what needed to be done in order to satisfy those who had already decided upon the takeover of the Middle East, the same very people that will protect him from justice now.
Blair is nothing, a nobody, just a vehicle used to perform the tasks of others. A vehicle now used up and ready for the scrap heap.
Let me know what you think about Mr Blair, was this the work of an evil man or simply the result of a weak man in power?