Introducing SARS-CoV-3 & COVID21

Sounds like some kind of baseless conspiracy theory, right? Well, that’s what I thought, however what I’m about to share with you may shock you and at the very least make you wonder what on earth is gong on!

A paper was brought to my attention published in the US National Library of Medicine entitled ‘RNase-Resistant Virus-Like Particles Containing Long Chimeric RNA Sequences Produced by Two-Plasmid Coexpression System'[1]. The purpose of this study is not what interested me, but more it’s reference to something we are all now very familiar with, ‘SARS-CoV2’. 

Now this may not seem significant, however when I tell you the date of this study was in 2008, well I’m sure suddenly this becomes a little more interesting.

But that’s not all, also in this study is a reference to SARS-CoV3:

A 3V armored L-RNA of 2,248 bases containing six gene fragments—hepatitis C virus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV1, SARS-CoV2, and SARS-CoV3), avian influenza virus matrix gene (M300), and H5N1 avian influenza virus (HA300)—was successfully expressed by the two-plasmid coexpression system and was demonstrated to have all of the characteristics of armored RNA. – ncbi.nlm.nih.gov[1]

This caught my interest, so the first thing I did was to try to find a reference to SARS-CoV2 or 3 prior to the 2020 pandemic we currently find ourselves in, and low and behold this pops up:

In 2003, multi-country outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV) left over 8000 people infected and had a death toll of over 700. In 2012, the novel coronavirus, MERS-CoV, which is related to SARS-CoV3, was first reported in Saudi Arabia – Science Daily[2]

I keep hoping to find an explanation, or even (beleive it or not) a fact checker response on these prior mentions of SARS-CoV2 and 3 prior to the pandemic, but so far nothing, nada, zilch.

Is SARS-CoV2 the same as SARS-CoV-2?

This was my first question, but the two terms, with the hyphen or without, seem to be interchangeable as both have frequently appeared throughout this pandemic. 

As for SARS-CoV3, other than the single quotation taken from the Science Daily article above I can find nothing else on it, just that it is related to the MERS-CoV virus. 

Pandemic 2.0

Bill Gates wanted a Pandemic, he’s been begging for one for years. Gates has been talking about man’s greatest threat for years, warning that the real danger is not in War or Terrorism, but a virus.

Well, he certainly got his wish – but I think we can all agree the Virus isn’t the most impressive killer, I’m sure it’s given Bill a good taster, but I’m sure you’ll agree – It does feel a little like a dummy run as the Government and their media whore’s scramble around trying to keep the fear factor of this pandemic alive and kicking.

Bill suggests that the next Pandemic could be much worse and we need to be ready for, he has already name the next pandemic, Pandemic 2.0.

 Introducing COVID21

Now here is where the information becomes less credible, but entirely plausible. The following is a supposed leaked email from a committee member within the Liberal Party of Canada. We cannot verify this:

Dear REMOVED,

I want to provide you some very important information. I’m a committee member within the Liberal Party of Canada. I sit within several committee groups but the information I am providing is originating from the Strategic Planning committee (which is steered by the PMO).

I need to start off by saying that I’m not happy doing this but I have to. As a Canadian and more importantly as a parent who wants a better future not only for my children but for other children as well. The other reason I am doing this is because roughly 30% of the committee members are not pleased with the direction this will take Canada, but our opinions have been ignored and they plan on moving forward toward their goals. They have also made it very clear that nothing will stop the planned outcomes.

The road map and aim was set out by the PMO and is as follows:

-Phase in secondary lock down restrictions on a rolling basis, starting with major metropolitan areas first and expanding outward. Expected by November 2020.

– Rush the acquisition of (or construction of) isolation facilities across every province and territory. Expected by December 2020.

– Daily new cases of COVID-19 will surge beyond capacity of testing, including increases in COVID related deaths following the same growth curves. Expected by end of November 2020.

– Complete and total secondary lock down (much stricter than the first and second rolling phase restrictions). Expected by end of December 2020 – early January 2021

– Reform and expansion of the unemployment program to be transitioned into the universal basic income program. Expected by Q1 2021.

– Projected COVID-19 mutation and/or co-infection with secondary virus (referred to as COVID-21) leading to a third wave with much higher mortality rate and higher rate of infection. Expected by February 2021.

– Daily new cases of COVID-21 hospitalizations and COVID-19 and COVID-21 related deaths will exceed medical care facilities capacity. Expected Q1 – Q2 2021.

– Enhanced lock down restrictions (referred to as Third Lock Down) will be implemented. Full travel restrictions will be imposed (including inter-province and inter-city). Expected Q2 2021.

– Transitioning of individuals into the universal basic income program. Expected mid Q2 2021.

– Projected supply chain break downs, inventory shortages, large economic instability. Expected late Q2 2021.

– Deployment of military personnel into major metropolitan areas as well as all major roadways to establish travel checkpoints. Restrict travel and movement. Provide logistical support to the area. Expected by Q3 2021. [3]

Sounds a little far fetched?

Well, just ask yourself this, if someone last year told you this year the World would be locking down it’s citizens for months at a time, human contact would be forcibly limited, children would be sitting isolated in playgrounds and elderly would be locked up on their own for months on end, and all because of a virus; would you have believed it, or would you have thought it was a little far fetched?

The leaked email continues on:

Along with that provided road map the Strategic Planning committee was asked to design an effective way of transitioning Canadians to meet a unprecedented economic endeavor. One that would change the face of Canada and forever alter the lives of Canadians. What we were told was that in order to offset what was essentially an economic collapse on a international scale, that the federal government was going to offer Canadians a total debt relief.

This is how it works: the federal government will offer to eliminate all personal debts (mortgages, loans, credit cards, etc) which all funding will be provided to Canada by the IMF under what will become known as the World Debt Reset program. In exchange for acceptance of this total debt forgiveness the individual would forfeit ownership of any and all property and assets forever. The individual would also have to agree to partake in the COVID-19 and COVID-21 vaccination schedule, which would provide the individual with unrestricted travel and unrestricted living even under a full lock down (through the use of photo identification referred to as Canada’s HealthPass) .

Committee members asked who would become the owner of the forfeited property and assets in that scenario and what would happen to lenders or financial institutions, we were simply told “the World Debt Reset program will handle all of the details”.

Several committee members also questioned what would happen to individuals if they refused to participate in the World Debt Reset program, or the HealthPass, or the vaccination schedule, and the answer we got was very troubling. Essentially we were told it was our duty to make sure we came up with a plan to ensure that would never happen.

We were told it was in the individuals best interest to participate. When several committee members pushed relentlessly to get an answer we were told that those who refused would first live under the lock down restrictions indefinitely. And that over a short period of time as more Canadians transitioned into the debt forgiveness program, the ones who refused to participate would be deemed a public safety risk and would be relocated into isolation facilities.

Once in those facilities they would be given two options, participate in the debt forgiveness program and be released, or stay indefinitely in the isolation facility under the classification of a serious public health risk and have all their assets seized.

So as you can imagine after hearing all of this it turned into quite the heated discussion and escalated beyond anything I’ve ever witnessed before. In the end it was implied by the PMO that the whole agenda will move forward no matter who agrees with it or not. That it wont just be Canada but in fact all nations will have similar roadmaps and agendas.

That we need to take advantage of the situations before us to promote change on a grander scale for the betterment of everyone. The members who were opposed and ones who brought up key issues that would arise from such a thing were completely ignored. Our opinions and concerns were ignored. We were simply told to just do it. [3]

I’ll be honest, I’m doubtful of the authenticity of the leaked email, not because I don’t think such a scenerio is possible, but rather I don’t beleive such an operation would be discussed and transmitted around political parties. I find it hard to believe such an operation would be discussed at all at that level and definitley not laid out in an email.

However, as I’ve discovered time and time again, we are not dealing with smart people we are dealing with psychopaths and sociopaths who’s actions don’t necessarily make sense.

Right now I don’t rule anything out, I will update this post as new information comes in. I’ll be the first to say that all of this seems a little far fetched, but as I said earlier, isn’t the reality we currently find ourselves in far fetched?

Let me know your thoughts on all of this, maybe you can shed some light on the pre-2020 SARS-CoV2 reference as well as the SARS-CoV3 reference. 

Sources:

1. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
2. sciencedaily.com
3. thecanadianreport.ca